Competency Evaluations

Immigration Competency Evaluations for California

Doctoral-level forensic competency assessments for immigration proceedings under the Matter of M-A-M- framework. Determines whether respondents can meaningfully understand the nature of proceedings, consult with counsel, and participate in their own case. If you or your client is unable to meaningfully participate in immigration proceedings due to a mental health condition, this evaluation assesses competency under federal standards.

$1,500 Flat Fee
5–7 Days Turnaround
PsyD Doctoral-Level
PsyD
Doctoral-Level Only
Immigration courts expect forensic-level expertise for competency determinations
PsyD/PhD
Required
MA-Level
Insufficient
Parallels forensic competency evaluations in criminal law (MacCAT-CA, ECST-R)

Why Immigration Cases Need Competency Evaluations

Without a formal competency evaluation, respondents with serious mental illness may be removed from the country without ever understanding the proceedings against them.

  • Rights Waived Without Understanding

    Respondents with serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or traumatic brain injury may waive legal rights they cannot comprehend. Without a competency evaluation, there is no record to support an appeal or request for safeguards.

  • Inability to Assist Counsel

    If a respondent cannot provide coherent personal history, remember relevant facts, or follow their attorney's guidance, the case cannot be properly prepared. A competency evaluation documents these impairments and triggers procedural safeguards.

  • Due Process at Stake

    Under Matter of M-A-M- and Franco-Gonzalez, immigration courts must assess whether respondents can meaningfully participate in their proceedings. A formal evaluation is often the only way to establish incompetency on the record and secure appointed counsel.

When Courts Order Evaluations

  • Respondent appears confused about the nature of proceedings
  • Respondent cannot communicate coherently with counsel
  • History of psychiatric hospitalization or serious mental illness
  • Intellectual disability or cognitive impairment
  • Traumatic brain injury affecting cognition
  • Severe PTSD affecting concentration, memory, or reality testing
  • Respondent waived counsel but appears incapable of self-representation

Under Matter of M-A-M- (BIA 2011), immigration judges can order a mental competency evaluation when any of these indicators are present.

What the Competency Evaluation Assesses

  • Understanding of Proceedings

    Can the respondent explain what immigration court is, what deportation means, and what their attorney's role is? Evaluates rational and factual understanding of the nature and object of the proceedings.

  • Ability to Assist Counsel

    Can the respondent provide coherent personal history, remember relevant facts, follow attorney guidance, and make informed decisions about their case? Assesses functional capacity for attorney-client collaboration.

  • Ability to Participate in Hearings

    Can the respondent sit through proceedings, respond to questions, understand testimony, and exercise their right to examine and present evidence? Evaluates courtroom participation capacity.

  • Standardized Competency Testing

    Administration of forensic instruments including MacCAT-CA (MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool), cognitive screening (MoCA, MMSE), and comorbid psychiatric assessment (PCL-5, PHQ-9, GAD-7).

  • Diagnosis-to-Impairment Nexus

    Not just identifying a diagnosis, but documenting specifically how that condition prevents meaningful participation. The report explains the mechanism connecting the mental illness to functional incompetency.

  • Recommended Safeguards

    Specific recommendations for accommodations that could restore or enable participation: appointed counsel, continuances, simplified proceedings, or other measures the court can implement.

From Referral to Final Report

A straightforward process designed for busy attorneys. Refer your client, and Dr. Mantonya handles the rest.

1

Attorney Referral

Contact Dr. Mantonya by email or phone. Share the case type, court deadlines, and any documentation indicating competency concerns.

2

Records Review

Dr. Mantonya reviews case documents, psychiatric history, medical records, and any court orders related to the competency inquiry.

3

Clinical Evaluation

Comprehensive forensic interview with standardized competency and cognitive testing via secure telehealth or in person.

4

Report Delivered

Detailed forensic report addressing the M-A-M- three-part test, delivered within 5 to 7 business days. Rush available.

5

Attorney Review

Collaborate on revisions at no additional charge until the report meets all legal requirements for the competency determination.

Transparent Flat-Fee Pricing

Flat Fee
$1,500
Per Competency Evaluation
  • Comprehensive forensic clinical interview
  • Standardized competency testing (MacCAT-CA, cognitive screening)
  • Comorbid psychiatric assessment battery
  • Document and records review
  • Detailed forensic report addressing M-A-M- three-part test
  • Recommended safeguards and accommodations
  • Spanish interpreter included at no extra cost
  • Unlimited attorney revisions
  • Telehealth available statewide in California
3-Day Rush
$2,250
24-Hour Rush
$3,000
Addendum
$500

Competency Evaluation FAQ

What is the legal standard for competency in immigration proceedings?

Matter of M-A-M- (BIA 2011) established a three-part test: the respondent must have a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings, the ability to consult with their attorney, and a reasonable opportunity to examine and present evidence. If any of these are impaired by mental illness, intellectual disability, or cognitive impairment, the court must consider safeguards. Matter of J-S-S- (BIA 2015) clarified that safeguards should be implemented early and do not require a full finding of incompetency.

Why does a competency evaluation require a doctoral-level psychologist?

Immigration competency evaluations parallel forensic competency evaluations in criminal law, which require specialized training in forensic assessment instruments like the MacCAT-CA and structured competency measures. PsyD and PhD psychologists receive specific training in these instruments and in connecting clinical diagnoses to functional legal impairments. Immigration judges expect the rigor of a forensic psychological evaluation, and MA-level clinicians typically lack the forensic assessment training these cases demand.

What happens after the court receives the competency evaluation?

If the evaluation supports a finding of incompetency, the immigration judge can implement safeguards under Matter of M-A-M- and Franco-Gonzalez. These may include appointing counsel for unrepresented respondents, granting continuances, simplifying proceedings, or accepting alternative forms of evidence. The goal is to ensure the respondent can meaningfully participate despite their mental health limitations. Even if the respondent is not found fully incompetent, graduated protections can be put in place.

Also Available

N-648 $1,500Asylum $2,000Cancellation of Removal $2,500

Ready to Get Started?

Contact us to discuss your case, confirm pricing, and schedule the evaluation. We respond within 24 hours.

[email protected] (555) 555-0199
Contact Us